Science & Nature

Newt Gingrich proposes a $2 billion prize for a human Moon lander – Ars Technica

Newt Gingrich proposes a $2 billion prize for a human Moon lander – Ars Technica

Newt space — Contest could spur outside investment in SpaceX and Blue Origin. Eric Berger – Aug 19, 2019 7:03 pm UTC Enlarge / Blue Origin has proposed a “Blue Moon” lander to send cargo and potentially humans to the Moon. During 2020 campaign speeches, President Donald Trump regularly touches on the theme of commercial…

Newt dwelling —

Contest could perchance spur open air investment in SpaceX and Blue Foundation.


A particular person on a stage stands in front of full-size model of a spaceship.
Lengthen /

Blue Foundation has proposed a “Blue Moon” lander to ship cargo and potentially folk to the Moon.

All the draw via 2020 campaign speeches, President Donald Trump continuously touches on the theme of commercial dwelling. Trump usually says he likes that Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and other billionaires who’re investing in aerospace are constructing reusable rockets and paying NASA hire to make consume of the company’s facilities.

Now, some advisers are quietly urging the president to private interplay his enthusiasm for commercial dwelling and entrepreneurs a step extra—by creating a prize for whoever lands folk on the Moon. The anxiousness, led by light Republican Speaker of the Dwelling Newt Gingrich, became first reported by Politico. It will award a $2 billion prize to the predominant firm to land folk on the Moon, and the winner would doubtlessly be Musk or Bezos.

NASA, for certain, already has its gain Moon concept named the Artemis Program. Beneath this concept, the dwelling company would consume its gain rocket (the Area Open Scheme) and spacecraft (Orion) as vehicles to position two folk onto the lunar floor by 2024. NASA has no longer specified how powerful accelerating a human return to the Moon will fee, nonetheless the value ticket is on the general $6 billion to $8 billion a year, on prime of the company’s present budget.

The $2 billion contest would no longer supplant the Artemis Program, talked about University of Southern California professor Greg Autry, who served on Trump’s NASA transition personnel in 2017. Autry helped conceive of the draw and says the contest would be a serve-up concept. In an interview with Ars, Autry talked about that, if NASA is no longer in funding this, then one other US company (such as the Department of Commerce) would be.

Incentive for investment

Even supposing $2 billion is no longer enough cash for either Musk’s SpaceX or Bezos’ Blue Foundation to land folk on the Moon, it represents a critical start. (Prof. Autry has argued for a full prize pool of $5 billion, with $3 billion going to the predominant firm to attain the Moon, whereas $2 billion serves as a serve-up prize.) More importantly, one of these prize would engender self assurance in capability traders in SpaceX and Blue Foundation.

Independently of NASA, and with deepest funding, both companies are working on expertise that could perchance enable a human return to the Moon at a magnificent lower fee than NASA’s veteran, linear approach against a 2024 landing. SpaceX is constructing a gargantuan spacecraft, Starship, and a Swish Heavy rocket. And Blue Foundation has its New Glenn rocket and Blue Moon lander vehicles. Every would adore to partner with NASA, both for funding and the company’s expertise in human spaceflight and data of the Moon.

Trump could perchance look the prize as a somewhat low-fee solution to build NASA’s intermediate purpose of a Moon landing whereas releasing up the dwelling company to pivot against his preferred destination, Mars. “Some day soon, American astronauts will plant the Stars and Stripes on the ground of Mars,” Trump talked about these days for the length of a speech that overlooked the Moon.

Needless to whine, whereas the president can indicate new packages, Congress need to fund them. On the least on the ground, both the US Dwelling and Senate appear to powerful dangle NASA’s present packages, which would be fastidiously divvied by Congress people all the draw via their districts and among liked contractors.

View Source

Most Popular

To Top